Im interested in getting answers from all NDERF stories ( circa 4000) - for example only for question 5 and 10 from your NDERF story database.
How can i do it?
How can i do it?
Giulia wrote: From my point of view, the best advice I can give a researcher is read all the reports and not only certain points, You never know what you might miss if you don't:
matik wrote: I've read above 100 reviews and its OBVIOUS for me and everyone I guess, that such database like NDERF should have advanced filtering:!: Otherwise, it's totally useless, especially for more scientific purposes.
I can't understand why it's still not possible??
Moreover it seems there is no one who takes care about this database and can seriously answer this question and request. I hope that NDERF questions and answers are working on MySQL or something like that where such filtering should be piece of cake.
Garry wrote: and does a very good job of keeping up with what it was originally designed to do which is
Give people the opportunity to post their story anonymously and allow Dr. Long to research the data as he needs to.
Garry wrote: Give people the opportunity to post their story anonymously and allow Dr. Long to research the data as he needs to.
matik wrote:Giulia wrote: From my point of view, the best advice I can give a researcher is read all the reports and not only certain points, You never know what you might miss if you don't:
Read >4000 reports? thats sounds like joke. Even so you (your brain) will not be able to remember and make conclusions from specific areas. That's why statistic analysis/filtering come to play.
I've read above 100 reviews and its OBVIOUS for me and everyone i guess, that such database like NDERF should have advanced filtering Otherwise its totally useless, especially for more scientific purposes.
matik wrote: So it seems that they want to keep this only for them and dont want to give people opportunity to filter reports ? They refused ? That would be very sad information, very sad :/ . It could be very helpfull for many people to be able to compare data, experiences or trends.
On main page is sentence "Our Mission: To research and study consciousness experiences and to spread the message of love, unity and peace around the world."
matik wrote: So this "research and study" in my opinion is very limited and handicapped for now. I cant realize why would they want to keep existing/public data filtering in secret...
Garry wrote: so please do not reply again with regard to access to the data. This conversation is now finished
Giulia wrote: if you only read the first 4 or 5 replies, you might be missing out crucial information
matik wrote: Please Gulia note that in book of Dr. Long there is a lot of such comparisons/collations - was'n it interesting for you ? I suppose almost everyone (excepts people like Garry maybe) would like to filter data according to his own preferences and draw out conclusions (which should be common in many aspects if live after live exists). More advanced process could filter words inside descriptions
Matik wrote: Sorry but you are not person who can tell me what i should write . Clearly you dont understand where problem lies and how important and valuable it could be for others. Besides I doubt you have any capability to free NDERF database up or code advanced filtering (especially without permission) . Also i doubt you have any willing to move this issue forward - "there is no filtering so it will never be and now shut up". SAD.
As i can see my request must be directed directly to Dr Long though i have hope he sometimes reads this forum. if not i will be forced to contact with him by mail or by other person who could meet him and know english well to get answer.
Garry wrote: I am the person who can tell you what is and is not acceptable here on the forum and I am telling you straight out " your attitude is not acceptable ".
Garry wrote: I will ban you so quick you head will spin. "
Garry wrote: Please take the time to read the rules and if you don't like them then leave and
Garry wrote: don't bother coming back as you are already not welcome here and I will go out of my way to make you visit the most.
Garry wrote: This link to this thread has already been sent to Dr. Long
Garry wrote: We are a subset forum of the original website and the SQL database is set up for the research of Dr Long and his wife .
It is not open to the public to search as you requested.
Giulia wrote: Just a quick reply, Matik, as it is almost 11 pm here in Italy and I promise to reply in detail in the morning.
matik wrote: As you can see Your "crucial" informations this time are not in indywidual reports but in statistic.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests