Re: Doctor Uncovers the TRUTH About Near Death Experiences | Dr. Raymond Moody
Posted: Mon May 20, 2024 10:27 am
Hello, Tony
SHARED-DEATH EXPERIENCES, as Dr. R. Moody calls them, are an extremely interesting topic, since the people co-experiencing the dying process and the life review are not suffering from oxygen deprivation.
Dr. Raymond Moody, a pioneer in near-death experience (NDE) research, introduced the concept of shared-death experiences (SDEs) as another piece of evidence for survival after death. Here's a breakdown of his idea:
Shared-Death Experiences (SDEs):
These occur when someone (usually a bystander) perceives elements of an NDE while the actual NDE is happening to another person nearby.
SDEs can involve seeing a bright light, feeling out-of-body, or encountering deceased loved ones – experiences commonly reported in NDEs.
Importantly, the person with the SDE is not clinically dead themselves.
Moody's Argument:
Traditional explanations for NDEs, like brain malfunction during near-death states, wouldn't explain SDEs.
If a dying person's brain is creating hallucinations, it wouldn't cause the same hallucinations in a healthy bystander.
SDEs suggest there might be a separate realm of consciousness that can be accessed during death or near-death experiences, which a bystander might be able to tap into under certain conditions.
Criticisms and Considerations about SDEs include the following points:
SDEs are less common than NDEs, making it harder to study them scientifically.
Skeptics argue that SDEs could be due to emotional contagion or picking up on subtle cues from the dying person's environment.
There could be psychological explanations for SDEs that haven't been fully explored.
Overall:
SDEs offer an intriguing perspective on NDEs, potentially challenging purely materialistic explanations.
More research is needed to understand the validity and causes of SDEs.
Skeptics argue that SDEs don't definitively prove life after death but offer another layer of evidence for further exploration.
Skeptics also say that there are alternative explanations for both NDEs and SDEs.
I wonder what kind of research could help us understand SDEs better.
I have personally had what I deem an SDE a few years ago. I will be happy to share the experience here as soon as I find my notes about the date on which this happened to me.
SHARED-DEATH EXPERIENCES, as Dr. R. Moody calls them, are an extremely interesting topic, since the people co-experiencing the dying process and the life review are not suffering from oxygen deprivation.
Dr. Raymond Moody, a pioneer in near-death experience (NDE) research, introduced the concept of shared-death experiences (SDEs) as another piece of evidence for survival after death. Here's a breakdown of his idea:
Shared-Death Experiences (SDEs):
These occur when someone (usually a bystander) perceives elements of an NDE while the actual NDE is happening to another person nearby.
SDEs can involve seeing a bright light, feeling out-of-body, or encountering deceased loved ones – experiences commonly reported in NDEs.
Importantly, the person with the SDE is not clinically dead themselves.
Moody's Argument:
Traditional explanations for NDEs, like brain malfunction during near-death states, wouldn't explain SDEs.
If a dying person's brain is creating hallucinations, it wouldn't cause the same hallucinations in a healthy bystander.
SDEs suggest there might be a separate realm of consciousness that can be accessed during death or near-death experiences, which a bystander might be able to tap into under certain conditions.
Criticisms and Considerations about SDEs include the following points:
SDEs are less common than NDEs, making it harder to study them scientifically.
Skeptics argue that SDEs could be due to emotional contagion or picking up on subtle cues from the dying person's environment.
There could be psychological explanations for SDEs that haven't been fully explored.
Overall:
SDEs offer an intriguing perspective on NDEs, potentially challenging purely materialistic explanations.
More research is needed to understand the validity and causes of SDEs.
Skeptics argue that SDEs don't definitively prove life after death but offer another layer of evidence for further exploration.
Skeptics also say that there are alternative explanations for both NDEs and SDEs.
I wonder what kind of research could help us understand SDEs better.
I have personally had what I deem an SDE a few years ago. I will be happy to share the experience here as soon as I find my notes about the date on which this happened to me.